Literary Review


 

 

 
Gun Violence and Mass Shootings

Rosario Galceran

University of Texas at El Paso


 

Abstract

Recently gun violence and mass shootings have been a main focus in the news.  People get the idea that mass shootings are increasing and having gun control laws will decrease the incident.  This paper will review what law enforcement is doing to respond to mass shootings as well as what type of weapons are being used in mass shootings.  Statistics on the number of mass shootings have been occurring since 1999 will be presented as well as how many people have died in these mass shootings.  A review of how gun control laws affect mass shootings and if other factors have been considered. 

Keywords:  First responders, active shooters, assault weapons. 


 

Gun Violence and Mass Shootings

Americans are being exposed to the news of gun violence on a daily basis.  The most horrific incidents are the ones in which many lives are taken in a short period of time, many times for unknown reasons.  These incidents are labeled as mass shootings, massacres, murderous rampages, active shooter incidents, or lone shooter incidents.  Once an incident occurs, a national discussion and/or debate on gun control are initiated through various media sources.  Mass shootings can happen anywhere, anytime, to anyone and in order to know if gun control is a solution, the reader needs to ask the following: 

  1. What is law enforcement doing to respond to mass shootings?
  2. What types of weapons have been used in mass shootings?
  3. Can gun control decrease mass shootings?
  4. What other factors are being considered to decrease mass shooting?

What is law enforcement doing to respond to mass shootings?

When discussing mass shootings, most people automatically think of law enforcement officers being the first to respond to the situation and taking control giving them the title of first responders.   Although this is true, they are not the only ones responding.  A shooting call will involve a multi-agency response to include law enforcement, emergency medical personnel and fire fighters.  These incidents are chaotic and unpredictable and by the time they are being reported to 911 there may already be casualties and will require a rapid response to stop the shooter or shooters before more victims are injured or killed.  “Gunfire, incendiaries, explosives, and secondary devices magnify the risks to responder” (Vernon, 2012, p.16).  In order for these first responders to be effective and decrease the number of casualties, they have to prepare for an incident before it happens.  According to Vernon (2012), “Preparation is the key to a mass-shooting incident.  That includes a clear idea of what your actions will be before the incident occurs.”  He continues to explain that this is done by having public safety agencies review their policies and procedures for active shooter incidents.  The public safety agencies must then get together to discuss and understand their roles keeping in mind that the safety of the responders is as important as the safety of the public.   The agencies have what is called a table top exercise in which they plan for a possible scenario from beginning to end.  Then they rehearse the scenario from beginning to end evaluating throughout the exercise what is going right and what is going wrong.  Once the rehearsal exercise is complete, all agencies will come back to the table and discuss the results.  “Coordination and cooperation are the keys to success” (Vernon, 2012, p.15). 

The author of this paper interviewed retired Assistant Police Chief of Staff Diana Kirk of the El Paso Police Department.  Chief Kirk began her career July 1985 as a patrol officer and 9 years later started her rise up the ranks as a Sergeant at the Northeast Sub-Station, In-Service Sergeant at the Academy, Lieutenant at Central Sub-Station, Captain of the Major Crimes Criminal Investigative Division, Commander, Assistant Chief, and finally as Assistant Chief of Staff until her retirement March 5, 2013.  She is currently an instructor for Criminal Justice at Park University at Fort Bliss, Texas and an Assistant Director of Park University.  When asked what event lead to how the El Paso Police Department responded to active shooter incidents, she replied that she remembered clearly that it was the Columbine incident in 1999.  Prior to the shooting in Columbine, police departments across the country trained one way and that was to secure the scene, secure the area, and call out for the Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT).  During the Columbine incident, it was evident that too much time had passed waiting for officers to stop the threat and not only were the shooters taunting their victims and killing them but they were not concerned about officers responding and had lots of time to carry out their plan including their suicide.  After the Columbine event, training changed across the country so that when there were a certain amount of officers at the scene, these officers did not wait for SWAT to be called out and their goal was to stop the threat immediately.  She goes on to explain, what also changed was that schools started to train for active shooter incidents just like they did fire drills in conjunction with law enforcement.  No school and no police department wanted to be unprepared for another mass shooting.  In Texas, the state’s legislature determines what training officers are required to review and exercise every 24 months and in addition, the El Paso Police Department added training for active shooter incidents as part of the Mobile Field Force training done annually.  This is continuous in-service training that keeps the officers skills up-to-date. 

These two sources clearly let the reader know that the main goal of not only law enforcement but other public safety agencies is to stop the threat and minimize further casualties.  They realize that by the time they are notified of the threat, injuries or deaths may have already occurred.

What types of weapons have been used in mass shootings?

The Office of Legislative Research (OLR) is the Connecticut General Assembly’s non-partisan research arm and they created a firearms list used in mass shootings.  The Senior Legislative Attorney, Janet L. Kaminski Leduc identified 49 mass shootings in the United States since the Columbine High School shooting in Littleton, Colorado on April 20, 1999.  The list is current as of January 18, 2013 and the weapons vary from one shooting to the next but the majority of the weapons are semi-automatic pistols or rifles and considered assault weapons.

To help define assault weapons, the website GunCite.com explains as follows:

“A genuine assault weapon, as opposed to a legal definition, is a hand-held, selective fire weapon, which means it’s capable of firing in either an automatic or a semiautomatic mode depending on the position of a selector switch.  These kinds of weapons are heavily regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and are further regulated in some states.  However, current “assault weapon” legislation defines certain semi-automatic weapons as “assault weapons.”  A semi-automatic weapon is one that fires a round with each pull of the trigger, versus an automatic weapon which continues to shoot until the trigger is released or the ammunition supply is exhausted.  These kinds of “assault weapons” are sometimes referred to as military-style semi-automatic weapons.” 

  According to the OLR weapons list and concentrating on three shooting incidents which had a high number of deaths, the weapons are described as follows.  April 20, 1999 at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, the weapons used in that shooting of 13 deaths are described as a Savage-Springfield 67H pump-action shotgun, 12 gauge; Hi-Point 995 Carbine, 9 mm caliber; pipe bomb; Intratec TEC-9 semi-automatic handgun, 9 mm caliber; and Stevens 311D double-barreled sawed-off shotgun, 12 gauge.  April 16, 2007 at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (known as “Virginia Tech”) in Blacksburg, Virginia with 32 deaths, the weapons used in this shooting are listed as Walther P22 semi-automatic pistol, .22 caliber, and Glock Model 19 semi-automatic pistol, 9 mm caliber.  December 14, 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut with 26 deaths, the weapon used was a Bushmaster semi-automatic rifle, .223 caliber.  According to the OLR weapons list, the number of mass shootings and deaths differs each year with no steady increase or decrease.  The shootings and death vary in no particular pattern.  The weapons used in each shooting fit the criteria of assault weapons. 


Table 1 shows the number of mass shootings from 1999 to 2012 taken from the OLR Research Report. 







Table 2 shows the number of deaths in mass shootings from 1999-2012 taken from the OLR Research Report.

 
According to Chief Kirk, officers have an expectation when responding to an active shooter event that the shooter has already planned out the situation and officers may be out-gunned.  She states that with incidents in the past, shooters are not going in with one gun.  Officers expect there may be multiple shooters with multiple weapons; probably high-powered weapons, explosives, and body armor. 

Both sources confirm that in mass shootings, the type of weapons used will be the type to cause the most casualties. 

Can gun control decrease mass shootings?

This author asked Chief Kirk if she thought gun control would decrease mass shootings and she replied, “No.  That’s my personal opinion and I’ll tell you why.  Because you can mimic the number of weapons, the amount of weapons, the type of weapons that people can get legally, but if a bad guy wants a gun, they’re going to get it.  They will buy it from the black market; they will get it from somewhere.  As long as they can pay the money, somebody out there is going to be willing to sell them a gun.”  Chief Kirk goes on to state that gun control is only making it harder for the law abiding citizen to own a gun as part of their second amendment right to bear arms.  To this day she states, there are no background checks for people who buy guns at gun shows and that’s where people, including convicted felons, are buying guns. 

According to NPR news program All Things Considered, aired March 20, 2013, (Welna 2013); gun control legislation was making its way through Congress.  But the ban was not getting enough support.  Senator Mark Pryor from Arkansas stated that he was not going to support the ban because he did not think that the people in his state wanted the ban.  He also stated that he did not think that the ban would be very effective.  Another senator stated that he was “wary of any gun measure that requires more record-keeping.”  According to the reporter, (Welna, 2013), measures that crack down on gun trafficking and funding more school security stand the best chance of winning Senate approval. 

In another article, Domenech (2013) writes, “When tragedy strikes on a national scale, our initial reactions have a commonality to them:  We recoil in shock and are overcome with sorrow.  But then, as anger and frustration set in, we begin to divide, to blame the things we have always blamed for the evils around us.  We insist that something must be done, steps must be taken, laws must be passed.”  (p. 25). 

What other factors are being considered to decrease mass shooting?

Chief Kirk states” law makers can come up with something and there will always be someone coming up with a solution around it.  People are spending too much time pointing the finger at someone else when a mass shooting occurs, when everyone just needs to take personal responsibility who owns a weapon, the care that needs to be taken in responsible ownership of a weapon.  Improve what we are already doing, we don’t do a good job conducting background checks on people who purchase guns and that needs to get fixed.  Universal background checks to include gun shows.”  She goes on to state, “As a police officer I do not think as a country we should infringe on even more on the rights of individuals, however, I do feel that a long time ago we should have done more in conducting background checks when weapons were sold wherever they were sold.  But we always wait until something happen and we as a country start pointing fingers and think that there is a one size fits all solution.  Gun control is not a one size fits all solution.  There are so many factors that have to be taken into consideration.  Look at our society for the greater protection of society.”   

.     Similar questions have been asked and according to Kellermann and Rivara (2013), “The answers are undoubtedly complex and at this point, only partly known.” 

In a Time magazine article, Cloud (2012) writes, “Is there a way to identify and stop mass killers before they unleash themselves?”  He writes of a study that was done by the Secret Service and the FBI in which they designed methods to spot mass killers before they act.  He writes, “The data showed that mass shooters don’t usually act impulsively and rarely made threats against enemies.  But they do tend to have experience with firearms.” 

Conclusion

            Based on this research, gun violence and mass shootings can occur anytime, anyplace, to anyone.  The constant training of law enforcement and other public agencies on how to respond to mass shootings has been essential in stopping a shooter but not from preventing the incident.  Gun control laws have not been effective on preventing mass shooters from obtaining assault type weapons used in mass shootings.  No experts have been able to identify a mass shooter in order to stop them from killing. 


References

Cloud, J. (2012). PREVENTING MASS MURDER.  Time, 180(6), 33.

Domenech, B. (2013). The Truth About Mass Shootings and Gun Control.  Commentary, 135(2), 25 29.

Halbrook, S.P., Kleck, G.,  (2010, October 24).  Assault weapons.  Retrieved from http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcassaul.html

Kellermann, A.L., & Rivara, F.P. (2013). Silencing the Science on Gun Research.  JAMA Journal of the American Medical Associations, 309 (6), 549-550. Doi:10.1001/jama,2012.208207.

Leduc, J. L. K. (2013, January 18). Weapons used in mass shootings.  Retrieved from http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/rpt/2013-R-0057.htm

Vernon, A. (2012). Mass Shooting Incidents: Planning and Response.  Fire Engineering, 163(9), 14-16


 

 
a

No comments:

Post a Comment